Terrorism: Fear, the Illusion of Safety, and Apathy towards Civil Liberties

 
On December 25th, 2009 an explosive device carried by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab failed to properly detonate aboard Northwest Airlines Flight 253 as it was approaching Detroit. No lives were lost and Abdulmutallab was placed in custody and is being charged with placing a destructive device in proximity to and attempting to destroy a US civil aircraft.
Even though the explosive failed to detonate as planned, and the airplane was left undamaged by the device, the attack might still become a success. While individual participants of terrorism might be motivated by the desire to inflict pain and death, the overriding motivation behind terrorism is simply terror. The goal of an attack like this is to make people change their way of life by using fear. That fear is the driving force behind the changes that are being considered to keep us “safe”.
 
The determining factor that decides if an attack was a “success” or a “failure” is not the actual attack, but rather the response to that attack. That response starts with the leaders of our country. If our leaders react in fear, then the attack should be considered a success even though the plane landed safely and Abdulmutallab is currently in custody. If the attack scares our leaders into disregarding the rights of their citizens, then the attack should be considered a success. If the leaders of our government pass laws that treat ordinary citizens like criminals and potential terrorists, then the attack should be considered a success.
 
Our leaders have passed laws allowing them to listen in on our conversation. Our government built the tools it needs to monitor our internet traffic and read our electronic correspondence without our knowledge, in order to keep us safe from terrorists. Our government forces us to file up single line, remove our shoes and belts, empty our pockets and allow strangers to search our personal belongings without a warrant. They say that this will keep us safe from the people that we fear. After each attack using an airplane, our leaders have reacted defensively and increased the tools that treat every person like a potential terrorist. After every action that resulted in our loss of privacy and liberty, another attack occurred.
 
In December of 2001, following the passage of the Patriot Act, Richard Reid attempted to detonate explosive hidden in his shoe on American Airlines flight 63. He was stopped by passengers and was unable to set of his explosive device, but judging by the lines of barefoot passengers lining up in front of metal detectors his attack should be considered a success. We remove our shoes and belts and send them on a trip through scanners that are unable to detect the explosives that were used in the attack.
 
In 2006 British Police arrested 25 suspects with connections to a plot using liquid explosives to destroy transatlantic flights. The attack was stopped before it even began and had the potential to be a failure. But judging by the actions of our leaders the attack should be considered a success. Airport trashcans are overflowing with discarded bottles of liquids, thrown away by travelers who are not potential terrorists by bringing a bottle of soda to the airport. Our leaders are scared that your bottle of water will destroy your airplane and TSA agents will make sure that you will be selected for secondary screening for bringing a potential explosive to the gate.
 
Now our leaders have the opportunity to decide if they will react to this latest attack. Will they choose to act motivated by fear, or will they choose to honor the privacy and liberty of their citizens. Full Body Scanners have slowly been installed in airports around the world. These scanners will keep you safe by allowing TSA agents to see you naked to make sure you are not hiding any weapons or explosives. Radiation is used to see through your clothing, and while our leaders say that your face is blurred out, the rest of your body will be on screen in a virtual naked state. These pictures are to be deleted after each passenger, and the agents are not supposed to know the identity of the nude pictures. At this time it seems like this attack might cause our leaders to require that passengers undergo a digital version of taking off their clothes, putting a paperback over their head to conceal their identity, and then walk past TSA agents that will look through their clothes and look at their body to make sure they are not terrorists. If our leaders decide that we are just one step away from being strip searched in order to fly on a commercial airliner, then this might become the most successful terrorist attack yet.
 
But regardless of the actions taken by our leaders, the final decision that determines if an attack will be a failure or a success will always be in our hands. The decisions that are made by our leaders will affect every aspect of our lives. The Constitution provides us with rights such as privacy and freedom from search without a warrant. Flying on a commercial airliner does not equal reasonable cause to be searched without a warrant. Terrorists will always be successful if we allow ourselves to be scared into giving up our rights, our privacy, and our liberty. If we continue to let the Government treat us like potential criminals, then we have given the terrorists what they are after. The terrorists are trying to create fear, and because we are fearful we let the Government do whatever it wants in order to keep us safe. The great people who founded this nation knew that certain rights should never be taken away.
 
Death is not the ultimate goal of terrorism, it is only the tool used to create fear. If we act in fear, and voluntarily give up our rights to allow the Government to protect us, then we are surrendering the only thing that is worth protecting in the first place.
 
Marcus Kesler
Pirate Party of the State of Oklahoma

Spot-on, Marcus!

Here, here!

Well said

        Wow, I couldn't have said it better myself! It's so true though, if we live in fear the terrorists win. If we allow our government to take away our constitutional rights and invade our privacy without warrants or probable cause, the terrorists win.  We cannot allow fear to control our lives because then we are giving terrorists the very thing they want.
        Full body scanners are a HUGE invasion of privacy and should not be used. I'm sorry, but thats just going WAY too far. People should speak their minds about this, its just plain wrong. The german Pirate Party actually organized protests all over Germany, at airports that were implementing these full body scanners, as seen in this article: http://www.independentpoliticalreport.com/2010/01/german-pirate-party-protests-invasive-airport-security-naked/
     I suggest similar protests here in the US, if there's enough support for it. We should speak out against this and be heard.
Is anyone else with me on this?

http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpps/n

http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpps/news/unruly-passengers-disrupt-northwest-fli...
Another recent example in Detroit where people on a plane were talking in Arabic and 'making inappropriate jokes about terrorism' resulted in federales detaining and interrogating the individuals.
It's interesting to note the comments to that news article: 
"Just stop letting mideastern Muslim men fly, period. Let the rest of us NOT obsessed with airline hijacking and a jihad against the West go about our day. No caucasians hijack or blow up civilian airliners. Its THEIR MO. USe some COMMONN SENSE! Not Political Correctness!"
Of course, our own government has committed more acts of terrorism than Muslim Extremists considering the history of military operations and coups in Panama, Chile, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc etc etc

Please leave your bias at

Please leave your bias at home. If you can't find it in you to be supportive of this country, you can always live in another one.

leaving the US

I'm not a fan of the sentiment that critics of US policy should just get up and move. Every member of the Party is, to some extent, a critic of US policy, even if not of its foreign policy. Insurgency has made needlessly provocative comments before, but I don't think this is one of them.

 "America: Love it or Leave

 "America: Love it or Leave it"
"You're either with us or against us"
Sorry - the Pirate Party is not some right-wing Tea Party organization. 
I reserve my right to criticize the unjust military actions of our government.

"with us or against us"

 What is are you trying to say - "you're either with us or against us?" and that no amount of criticism of the military actions of our own government is acceptable ?
For one I was agreeing with D-USA's original article that the "culture of fear" created by sensationalizing "terrorism" is eroding our civil liberties.
For two, I was pointing out several instances of US military operations in other countries where without a formal congressional declaration of war, US troops have invaded sovereign nations, killed thousands of innocent civilians, for specific purposes such as land grabs (Panama Canal), resources (Iraq), or supposedly in the name of "fighting terrorism" and "exporting Democracy". 
It's not a crime to speak up against US military actions, just as we should be vocal about corruption in other areas of government.

It is possible for us to

It is possible for us to discuss our civil liberties without fear and war mongering. There may be a proper time and place to list all the greivances we have with our country, but in every post you make is not it. I too agree that you can be unhappy with your country and still be fiercly loyal; no one's happy with everything any POTUS or any Congress has signed, ordered, or voted on. But I'd repeat myself, and say that there's an appropriate time to make an argument that the US has committed terrorist acts abroad; yet during a discussion of our civil liberties here at home is not that appropriate time I speak of.

 Thanks Haplo but I

 Thanks Haplo but I respectfully disagree that there should be a 'proper time and place' to criticize our government's actions. We are involved in a military operation that is based on lies and fear mongering that resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians. Why is it inappropriate to bring this up in a conversation about terrorism?

 i agree with insurgency on

 i agree with insurgency on this. it isn't off-topic or inappropriate to bring that point up here. by the way haplo, the love it or leave it policy and the refusal to criticize political leaders invites the degradation of civil rights and freedoms and tyranny as opposed to democratic rule by the people. 

You must have been reading

You must have been reading some other comment.

no, i don't think i was

 "Please leave your bias at home. If you can't find it in you to be supportive of this country, you can always live in another one."
 
look familiar? it's yours after all.......
 
edit: i apologize to the admins if i am breaking any rules in this post
 

Then let me enlighten you:

" the refusal to criticize political leaders"
 
I didn't say this at all. Please read :-)

Love it or leave it

 I'm glad someone else said it. 
 
We're an international party as well, so nationalistic comments like that kinda miss a lot of the point.  We're a political ideology without borders.

A time and place for everything?

And you are the one to set it?
 
Seems to me a political party forum is the right place exactly for comments about techniques of governance, including bad techniques for governance, like "Love it or Leave It" or more properly " Shape up or ship out of the pirate party."
 
P PUS indicates a venereal disease.

Profiling Works Ask Israel

We don't need more TSA agents , Scanners or Grandma taking off her shoes at airports.  Just ask the Israelis.  They haven't had a single terrorist incident on their planes.  And they don't hassle their passengers nearly as much as US.  They use common sense.  If a person buys a one way ticket to a cold area wearing warm weather clothes and no checked luggage something might be up.  Other important clues Paid in cash, Passport has visits to known terrorist countries person is male between 18 and 55.  If a person has two or more of these and other suspicious characteristics they are pulled aside and asked a few questions.  This is a much better system than ours. 

 Paid cash, male between

 Paid cash, male between 18-55, looks 'suspicious', booked day or two before flight, That's been me multiple times. even the 'cold area wearing warm clothes (trip to Vegas in November - some joker told me it'd be warm, but it wasn't that cold either, just around freezing)
 
These things don't work.
 
too broad, and 'silly'